Skip to main content

Table 5 Known-group comparison

From: The use of the Multidimensional Condom Attitude Scale in Chinese young adults

 

Female

Male

Cohen,s D effect Size

p value

n

Mean (SD)

n

Mean (SD)

Reliability and effectiveness

300

20.27 (4.22)

200

21.50 (4.44)

0.28

< 0.01

Displeasure

300

6.54 (1.61)

200

6.28 (1.92)

0.14

0.12

Excitement

300

7.86 (1.54)

200

8.07 (1.79)

0.13

0.17

Identity stigma

300

26.86 (3.28)

200

26.08 (3.93)

0.22

0.02

Embarrassment about negotiation

300

18.56 (3.02)

200

19.16 (3.21)

0.19

0.03

Embarrassment about purchase

300

17.53 (3.63)

200

20.08 (3.891)

0.68

 < 0.01

 

Heterosexual

Sexual minorities/others

Cohen’s D effect Size

p value

n

Mean (SD)

n

Mean (SD)

Reliability and effectiveness

437

20.94 (4.36)

63

19.48 (4.04)

0.35

0.01

Displeasure

437

6.36 (1.71)

63

6.92 (1.92)

0.31

0.02

Excitement

437

7.89 (1.67)

63

8.30 (1.43)

0.26

0.06

Identity stigma

437

26.61 (3.62)

63

26.11 (3.25)

0.10

0.30

Embarrassment about negotiation

437

18.96 (3.09)

63

17.68 (3.02)

0.42

 < 0.01

Embarrassment about purchase

437

18.59 (3.99)

63

18.25 (3.61)

0.09

0.52

 

With history of sexual experience

Without history of sexual experience

Cohen’s D effect Size

p value

n

Mean (SD)

n

Mean (SD)

Reliability and effectiveness

390

21.04 (4.15)

110

19.76 (4.86)

0.28

0.01

Displeasure

390

6.26 (1.72)

110

7.04 (1.71)

0.45

 < 0.01

Excitement

390

7.92 (1.73)

110

8.01 (1.29)

0.06

0.63

Identity stigma

390

26.66 (3.43)

110

26.15 (4.03)

0.14

0.23

Embarrassment about negotiation

390

19.46 (3.04)

110

16.45 (2.04)

1.17

 < 0.01

Embarrassment about purchase

390

18.87 (4.10)

110

17.41 (3.06)

0.40

 < 0.01

  1. SD standard deviation
  2. Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude towards condom use.